<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Organizing and cataloging a design library:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>An iSchool capstone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving forward by Gwen Rice</title>
		<link>http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/moving-forward/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I really want to like LibraryThing...but our little barcode scanner has arrived and LibraryThing has been down almost all morning. I got one book entered as a trial (I think), and they&#039;re back down. I hope it&#039;s not a Sign of how it&#039;s going to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to like LibraryThing&#8230;but our little barcode scanner has arrived and LibraryThing has been down almost all morning. I got one book entered as a trial (I think), and they&#8217;re back down. I hope it&#8217;s not a Sign of how it&#8217;s going to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving forward by Gwen Rice</title>
		<link>http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/moving-forward/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-17</guid>
		<description>We now have our account set up with LibraryThing, and have ordered a barcode scanner, so we are truly moving forward! We&#039;ve cleaned out the junk books from the collection are are ready to roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now have our account set up with LibraryThing, and have ordered a barcode scanner, so we are truly moving forward! We&#8217;ve cleaned out the junk books from the collection are are ready to roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 2 progress by organizingdesign</title>
		<link>http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/week-2-progress/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>organizingdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-8</guid>
		<description>You can actually set up a circulation-type solution on LibraryThing. If you look at the different &quot;styles&quot; you can choose for viewing the library material on the site, there is a pen after the last option. Clicking on that will allow you to edit the style. Choosing, then, style A you can have the book&#039;s title, author, and tags show up, as well as a section called &quot;summary&quot; and a section called &quot;comments.&quot; There&#039;s also an option for &quot;private comments.&quot; From all I can tell, when you edit &quot;comments,&quot; you don&#039;t edit the book&#039;s metadata site-wide. My idea was using &quot;comments&quot; for people to edit wiki-style when materials are checked out (so under comments, whoever removes the material from the library would put &quot;Joe has this book at his desk&quot;). The &quot;summary&quot; section as I envisioned would allow the users of the library to add anything valuable there -- if the book would be particularly good for those seeking inspiration on green flooring, for example, someone can add that to the summary (which gives it a very user-centric spin, versus the summary that can be pulled from those in Amazon or the Library of Congress). I suspect, too, that &quot;private comments&quot; might be an additional solution to the check-out system, but rather than make it public to anyone, it&#039;d be just to those who have access to the library or are signed into the library. 

The MySQL/PHP solution is viable, but my concern with it is that it&#039;s not as user-friendly and there is a little barrier to entry for people without tech background. Although I&#039;m not particularly focusing on the social dynamics of LibraryThing, I think that there is some added value to it in an institution that&#039;s not going to have a permanent staff member to man the library -- it&#039;d be an additional vault of resources for inspiration, research, and so forth. I&#039;ve really come to appreciate the value that LibraryThing could have simply in its ability to connect books to other books and to people with similar interests and bookshelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can actually set up a circulation-type solution on LibraryThing. If you look at the different &#8220;styles&#8221; you can choose for viewing the library material on the site, there is a pen after the last option. Clicking on that will allow you to edit the style. Choosing, then, style A you can have the book&#8217;s title, author, and tags show up, as well as a section called &#8220;summary&#8221; and a section called &#8220;comments.&#8221; There&#8217;s also an option for &#8220;private comments.&#8221; From all I can tell, when you edit &#8220;comments,&#8221; you don&#8217;t edit the book&#8217;s metadata site-wide. My idea was using &#8220;comments&#8221; for people to edit wiki-style when materials are checked out (so under comments, whoever removes the material from the library would put &#8220;Joe has this book at his desk&#8221;). The &#8220;summary&#8221; section as I envisioned would allow the users of the library to add anything valuable there &#8212; if the book would be particularly good for those seeking inspiration on green flooring, for example, someone can add that to the summary (which gives it a very user-centric spin, versus the summary that can be pulled from those in Amazon or the Library of Congress). I suspect, too, that &#8220;private comments&#8221; might be an additional solution to the check-out system, but rather than make it public to anyone, it&#8217;d be just to those who have access to the library or are signed into the library. </p>
<p>The MySQL/PHP solution is viable, but my concern with it is that it&#8217;s not as user-friendly and there is a little barrier to entry for people without tech background. Although I&#8217;m not particularly focusing on the social dynamics of LibraryThing, I think that there is some added value to it in an institution that&#8217;s not going to have a permanent staff member to man the library &#8212; it&#8217;d be an additional vault of resources for inspiration, research, and so forth. I&#8217;ve really come to appreciate the value that LibraryThing could have simply in its ability to connect books to other books and to people with similar interests and bookshelves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 2 progress by Joel</title>
		<link>http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/week-2-progress/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizingdesign.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m up against a similar problem. I have to create some kind of catalog and classification system that a group of non-librarians will be able to maintain. I&#039;ve considered LibraryThing as an easy solution but haven&#039;t thought of any way to either circulate books or track circulation besides adding a &quot;checked out&quot; tag. So, I&#039;m considering a MySQL/PHP solution since it will allow me to give the users an interface (i.e., IE or Firefox) with which they&#039;re familiar. It&#039;s scalable as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m up against a similar problem. I have to create some kind of catalog and classification system that a group of non-librarians will be able to maintain. I&#8217;ve considered LibraryThing as an easy solution but haven&#8217;t thought of any way to either circulate books or track circulation besides adding a &#8220;checked out&#8221; tag. So, I&#8217;m considering a MySQL/PHP solution since it will allow me to give the users an interface (i.e., IE or Firefox) with which they&#8217;re familiar. It&#8217;s scalable as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
